Wednesday, October 18, 2006

Los Angeles will lose one of it's symbols

City's palm trees, one of the symbols of Los Angeles, are vanishing.

Trees are dying of old age and a fungal disease, disappearing one by one from parks and streets, and city planners are replacing them with oaks, sycamores and other species that are actually native to Los Angeles and offer more shade, too.

Not all palms are infected, and there is no danger of their vanishing altogether any time soon. But some parts of the city could look noticeably different in the years ahead. And that troubles some residents.

"I think the palm tree kind of fits with the whole Southern California vibe," says Jonathan Scott, who manages the fashionable downtown restaurant The Palm.

Palm tree may be a better symbol of Los Angeles than many realize. Like the many young people who come to Los Angeles in search of Hollywood stardom, palm trees are not even native to the city; they were brought 100 years ago or more from Latin America and elsewhere.

Tropical trees that sway gently in the breeze and can grow as high as a 12-story building are everywhere -- from postcards that fill Hollywood souvenir shops to the streets of wealthy oceanfront enclaves and the barrios east of downtown.

Palm tree has become so intertwined with the image of the city that its name is plastered all over liquor stores and cheap hotels. Neil Diamond once sang of Los Angeles as a place where "palm trees grow and rents are low."



It has been years, of course, since rents were low in the city. And now the palm trees are starting to go.

Problem, says Steve Dunlap, a supervising tree surgeon with the Los Angeles Recreation and Parks Department, is that large numbers of the Canary Island Date Palm -- trees with rough trunks and a topknot of fronds that look like green dreadlocks -- are succumbing to a fungal disease.

Tree surgeons do not know how to stop the fungus, which gets into the soil. Dunlap said it does not make sense to replace dying palms with new ones that will probably fall victim to the same ailment. So the city has been planting other varieties of trees.

Nearly 1.6 million trees of all varieties fill the city's parks and line its streets. But city officials had no immediate figures on how many of them are palm trees and how many are dying.

Residents and business owners unable to stand the thought of Los Angeles losing its palms can still buy their own and plant them on their property.

Moreover, hundreds of Mexican palms, which look a lot like the Canary Island Date Palm and were planted throughout the modest neighborhoods of south Los Angeles to herald the 1932 Olympics, are still thriving.



Palms are vanishing just as Los Angeles is kicking off an ambitious project to plant a million new trees. On October 1, officials gave away 3,000 trees, and they have compiled a list of nearly 60 varieties they are planting and encouraging residents to plant. Palm trees did not make the cut.

"They don't provide the same benefits as the other, more leafy trees," says Paula Daniels, a Board of Public Works commissioner who is heading up the planting effort.

Their tall, bare trunks make them inferior when it comes to providing shade, Daniels said, and some experts believe their scant leaves make them less effective at trapping air pollution.

And while sun-dappled palms lining a freeway may look good in the movies or on a postcard, Dunlap said people standing beside them can feel as if they are next to a telephone pole.

"Oak trees are more native to L.A. than palm trees?" Scott Wannberg said from behind the counter of a trendy bookstore, not far from the palm-lined streets of Hollywood. "I don't know about that, but I know one thing: I like palm trees!"

2 Comments:

At 15 September, 2007 17:13 , Blogger Who is Blue Hippo Baby? said...

Horray! I dislike the palms and I live in south Los Angeles, in a 'modest' neighborhood. We have several large native trees on my street and they are absolutely beautiful and peaceful to look at. Away with the ugly palm trees that only enhance the look of urban sprawl and uselessness I associate with this city (which I don't like much). I admit that palms all lined up on a boulevard can look good, but for most of this city they are just randomly spread around and look terrible and ill kept. Plus the palms host obnoxious south american parrots that sqwak like turkeys every morning and wake me up!

 
At 17 November, 2007 22:29 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

My very first memory of California was waking up in my parents car in 1956-57 and seeing the long rows of palms that flanked the blvds. in Whittier. Southern Calif. will never be what it was if the palms are removed. They are the history of the L.A. basin. Ranchers and the first city streets that were built were lined with palms. Ranchers would criss-cross them and braid them when they were young for front entrances of land and homes.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home